Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 26 July 2017

Ode on solitude

                                         
                                        
   
     
Ode on solitude: 

 Poem:

Happy the man, whose wish and care
A few paternal acres bound,
Content to breathe his native air,
In his own ground.

Whose herds with milk, whose fields with bread,
Whose flocks supply him with attire,
Whose trees in summer yield him shade,
In winter fire.

Blest! who can unconcern'dly find
Hours, days, and years slide soft away,
In health of body, peace of mind,
Quiet by day,

Sound sleep by night; study and ease
Together mix'd; sweet recreation,
And innocence, which most does please,
With meditation.

Thus let me live, unseen, unknown;
Thus unlamented let me die;
Steal from the world, and not a stone
Tell where I lie.
     
                     
Analysis:
                                      
                       Poem, analysis & critical summary in this video
     
        Ode on solitude is written by Alexander Pope when he was twelve years old, and widely included in anthologies. Initially in this poem poet talks about a lonely life of farmer. We thing that the life of the farmer is unfortunate because of he has to live in the farm and away from the society but the poet consider the life of the farmer a fortunate one because a farmer get the chance to breath his ‘native air’ and he also get the opportunity to leave in motherland.

             The poet again emphasis on haw lucky the farmer are. In the second stanza the poet say that the farmer get to eat bread from his own field and says that “flocks supplies the farmer his attire” and during the summer time if the son light thrown on the farmer with its heat then tree in the farm provides him ‘shade’.

           Especially in the society people consider solitude as a ‘curse’ but Pope things that solitude is ‘bliss’, he explain this thing in the third  stanza of this poem. A farmer can take pleasure of pure air and food and he can stay close to nature which provides him the peace of mind. While we the people have to struggle a lot to earn over bread and to survive in the modern life. People of city struggle a lot and at they do not get to eat and drink healthy food and water they do not even get to breath in fresh air. 
      
            While people who are live close to nature especially farmers can get ‘sound sleep’ at night and most important thing they do not lose their innocence. On the contrary people who live in society away from the nature become very practical without emotion and innocence there for the poet consider solitude life is bliss.  As people who live in solitude do not have to care much about what the society would think about him. Such people do not need to follow the traditions or rituals set by the society they just have to care about themselves only. Such people live happy satisfied and carefree fortunate life close to nature.

       There for in the last stanza the poet urges to let him live “unseen, unknown”.


                          “Thus unlamented let me die
                           Steal from the would and not a stone
                           Tell where I lie”.

        In the above lines the poet then say the way a man lives solitude life. At the end of his life he wants such death also unknown from the world.

Tuesday, 18 July 2017

The Waste Land by T. S. Eliot (classroom activity)

 This blog is my classroom activity.

 Here is link of classroom activity.

                                                Click here.

My answer of three question is below.

1) What are your views on the following image after reading 'The Waste Land'? Do you think that Eliot is regressive as compared to Nietzche's views? or Has Eliot achieved universality of thought by recalling myth-historical answer to the contemporary malaise?

                                     

Ans 1)  Yes, I think that Eliot is regressive as compared to Nietzche’s view because Eliot believes in divine power like God and also he was believed in spirituality and religion. On the other side Friedrich Nietzsche was   Philosopher so obviously his thoughts were logical  but he totally forward looking so he not believe in God and he say that “God is died”. Nietzsche was like atheist, he believe in human power is superior than God or like any divine power. He was such believe in progressive and forward looking not in God. He was not believed in any myth or superstitions. On the other side Eliot was totally believe into God and myth. So both are different from each other at a one level. In the poem “The waste Land” we have see various myths like Buddha, Christ, Tristan, Apollo etc... So was known as backward looking person. He has also taken some mythical symbols like: Religious, River, Buddhist, season, thunder, animal world, Christianity, landscape water etc…  He uses many references from the past and present also. This poem is about Europe civilization, but it was connected with past and present. So we can say that Eliot and Nietzsche both are totally different from each other.


2) Prior to the speech, Gustaf Hellström of the Swedish Academy made these remarks:

                                        

    What are your views regarding these comments? Is it true that giving free vent to the repressed       'primitive instinct' lead us to happy and satisfied life? or do you agree with Eliot's view that 'salvation of man lies in the preservation of the cultural tradition'?

   

Ans 2)   In the second question that prior to the speech Gustaf Hellastrom of Swedish academy he says to salvation of man lie. Eliot views are more philosophical and he is believed in religious thinking.  Eliot believes in human law but Freud believes in individual thinking. So it is true that free vent to the repressed ‘primitive instinct’ lead as to happy and satisfied life but this depend on individuality. The thinking of Eliot and Freud are in opposite direction. Freud was believed in collective consciousness and Eliot believes in salvation which lies in the preservation of cultural tradition. It is preexisted means already there and which must preserve it chaos is to be avoided.

 

3) Write about allusions to the Indian thoughts in 'The Waste Land'. (Where, How and Why are the Indian thoughts referred?
 

Ans 3)  Allusion to the Indian thought we have found various ways in this poem “The waste Land”. We have found various myth, cultures and also language to connect the world with one universal thought. Eliot uses many references like Buddhism, Christianity, Indian myths and many more for the solution of sexual perversion and spiritual degradation prevalent at that time in European civilization.


                   In the last part of the poem “What the thunder said” he described the solution of spiritual degradation by referring Indian culture and Upanishads. This title is from Upanishad – Prajapati spoken in thunder akashwani – to devotees are pointed out the way of salvation. He also referred in this part Himvant, then Ganga.


                   In this part Eliot uses the three “Da” taken from “Brihadaranyaka Upanishad".


1.) Datta – giver

2.) Dayadhvam – compassion

3.) Damyata – self-control


 Datta: What have we given?

             My friend blood shaking my heart

             The awful daring of a moment's surrender

              Which an age of prudence can never retract

              By this, and this only, we have existed

              Which is not to be found in our obituraies

              or in memories draped by the beneficient spider

              Or under seals broken by the lean solicitor

              In our empty rooms


Dayadhvam: I have heard the key

               Turn in the door once and turn once only

                We think of the key, each in his prision

               Thinking of the key, each confirms a prison

               Only at nightfall, aetherial rumours

              Revive for a moment a broken coriolanus


Damyata: The boat responded

            Gaily, to the hand expert with sail and oar

            The sea was calm, your heart would have

            responded

           Gaily, when invited, beating obedient

           To controlling hands

           I sat upon the shore

           Fishing, with the arid plain behind me

           Shall I at least set my lands in order?"


At last he uses

“Shantih shantih shantih”. This last line of the poem suggest a ultimate peace.